Meditation ~Page 2
by Pir Vilayat Inayat KhanIt's like looking at a
holograph. We shift our glance, or the perspective of our glance, and
all of a sudden we see the same thing, but in another perspective.
It's the same forest but it's an alternate perspective, because we are
seeing it from the point of view of the trees instead of just from our
limited vantage point. The emotion is a wonderful sense of resonance
with - kinship really - with all created things. As Saint Francis
said, "I thought I was looking at the world, but the world was looking
at me."
When we start meditating, we think we are the observer, or the
spectator of the knowing subject. Our problems, or our thoughts, or
our memory of the physical world are the objects of our cognizance.
Now we've reversed that. In fact, the whole Universe is looking at
itself through our eyes.
We can do the same thing talking with another person. While we are
paying attention to what they are saying, and what we are saying, we
can still communicate with him/her at a deep soul level. What s/he is
saying is very inadequate in comparison with what s/he implies behind
what s/he says, and the same with what we say, what we imply behind
what we say.
If meditation is a rehearsal for life, think of a person with whom
we've had difficulty communicating. Maybe there is a way of obviating
the obvious by communicating with him/her at a deeper level. In any
case, there is no way in which we can explain what we imply, and it's
the same for that person.
The next phase is called turning within. This is the quantum leap;
it is the point at which our meditation really starts. If we are
limiting ourselves to the input of the environment, we're not
validating the impact of our being upon the environment. Consequently
we are determined, we are conditioned. We're trying to interpret what
is happening with a very inadequate mind or mode of thinking.
The same thing happens with our food. In order to digest our food,
we produce enzymes. The enzymes are going to act on the food -
proteins, and fats, and hydrocarbons - in order to transform them into
amino acid chains that we can incorporate in ourselves. There is an
action of us upon the environment, or the way the environment has been
ingested. This is the key to unfurling the potentialities of our
being. Therefore, it is important in terms of our self-esteem.
I find the way to do this is to downplay thoughts regarding the
environment - the physical environment, or the social environment, or
the psychological envi- ronment, even the emotion of the psychological
environment. In fact, emotion plays a very important part here.
Downplay that impact; don't eradicate it altogether, simply downplay
it. It's just like a holograph, we downplay one perspective in order
to highlight another. Of course we can't do it with our will. We need
a kind of imperviousness that safeguards the integrity of our being
from being caught up in the hoax of the way things appear.
We are pulled two directions. On one hand we need to involve
ourselves with people, with the circumstances of life, with what has
been achieved by our civili zation, to participate in these great
achievements. On the other hand we realize our involvement is always
at the cost of our freedom.
We think it is circumstance that curtails our freedom. In fact we
can be free in our opinion, and in our emotion, and in our identity,
while being extremely constrained by circumstances. The vagabond is
not necessarily free. We need to find our freedom, first of all with
regard to opinion. We realize our opinion is not absolute; it is
relative. I don't say it's not valid. It's relative. Then we find some
kind of freedom from our obstinacy. We question our opinion. That
helps us downplay the impact of the memory of the environment.
We feel a kind of emotion - we can't do this with our will- the
emotion of peace rather than joy, what it feels like to find ourselves
at peace with ourselves, and with people, and with life. It is really
independence, and we know how depen- dent we have become in the world.
That's why a sannyasin, or a dervish, finds freedom more easily,
because he or she is much less dependent upon those things that we, in
our civilizations, are dependent upon: our comfort, our facilities.
Life has become much more comfortable for us than for people living in
the caves in the Himalayas.
Dependence can lead to addiction, which is much more serious than
dependence, not necessarily addiction to drugs, but all kind of
things: TV, chatting, being loved instead of loving - a lot of
addictions. There is no doubt those addictions impair our self-esteem.
The reason for the extraordinary power of those sannyasins and rishis,
the reason for their power, is they have found freedom from dependence
upon anything. In the dervishes it's the Divine power. I've found
greater power amongst the dervishes than amongst the rishis in the
Himalayas, because of the sense of the Divine investiture in their
being, the majesty of the Divine being they've inherited, that we've
all inherited.
<--Back
Next-->